Forget Smallville, Lex Should Destroy Farmville.

Forget Smallville, Lex Should Destroy Farmville

Lex Luther is often written as some evil maniac hell bent on killing that man of steel, but what is often forgotten is the motive. He's just trying to protect America from this illegal alien. In a sense, he's a hardcore republican like that.

What he should be doing is protecting America from itself. We seem to have been thrown in a facebook world of monotonous action in raising a virtual farm. If you weren't aware of it already, Farmville has been fucking up society for a while. Here's a pretty good essay on the subject.

Farmville is not a good game. While Caillois tells us that games offer a break from responsibility and routine, Farmville is defined by responsibility and routine. Users advance through the game by harvesting crops at scheduled intervals; if you plant a field of pumpkins at noon, for example, you must return to harvest at eight o’clock that evening or risk losing the crop.

Each pumpkin costs thirty coins and occupies one square of your farm, so if you own a fourteen by fourteen farm a field of pumpkins costs nearly six thousand coins to plant. Planting requires the user to click on each square three times:

once to harvest the previous crop, once to re-plow the square of land, and once to plant the new seeds. This means that a fourteen by fourteen plot of land—which is relatively small for Farmville—takes almost six hundred mouse-clicks to farm, and obligates you to return in a few hours to do it again. This doesn’t sound like much fun, Mr. Caillois. Why would anyone do this?

While it's just some guy with a French sounding name saying some random things, it's still a pretty accurate statement



I've seen a lot of similar analysis of Facebook-style games and how weird and patently unfun they are when compared to basically any other form of game/recreation we willingly pursue. I've never played any Facebook games as they sounded as annoying as the people I know who aren't in college anymore, but still spend all day on Facebook playing them and updating you their smallest achievements.

While I'm not going to claim to be the king of productivity, I do think that those Facebook games are just the poorest use of time and completely void of fun and I'm not sure how you can find games like that even remotely playable and not get flash backs of your boring monotonous day job. So I have to ask, how is it an escape from the 9 to 5?



In every sense of the word, Farmville has become the cutesy more socially acceptable version of World of Warcraft. Only you see less elf T&A. Oh wait, no. That was Lineage II. But you get the point, it's a standard issue leveling up repetitive bullshit game that I have no idea why anyone invest so much time in.

I don't go into 7-11 much anymore. I used to. I used to a lot. I was drinking at least one big gulp a day right before my second heart attack. So it came to a surprise when I realized that these multi-million dollar Facebook games were crossing over and successful enough to market to folks at 7-11.



How the hell is this game company making millions? I guess when you take the same formula and apply different genres to it like Mafia wars/Farmville/other zynga game themed products and then slap them on drinking products at 7/11, you are clearly making a lot of money you can easily piss away.

Then again, it's only fitting that a game that robs you of your productivity time as well as your money for stupid online only upgrades will be in a store that hikes up the prices of just about everything.

It is pretty funny that nothing on the shelf of a 7-11 could even remotely be considered as once coming from anything that looks like the farm you keep on bugging me to help you grow. Then again, Factoryville doesn't have the same ring to it.

A couple of weeks ago there was a billboard put up near my place advertising the L.A. County Fair...



It's a pretty sad day in America when I agree with the local fair. I mean, do you know how much lard they use to deep fry any and everything? It has to be some scary levels of heart conditions with any of your meals there. Let alone the amount of shanking that happens on those fair grounds. It's really pretty scary.

But again, the billboard makes a valid point. Though, I'm not sure how much entertainment comes from petting a goat. I mean, it's a fucking goat. Shouldn't it be eating a soda can or something? I'm not sure if they're claim is exactly true in that, but I guess I'm just saying they are half right.

But now that we are talking about the fair, it ends tomorrow. Ha, see how I promoted that piece of shit place a day before it closes? Yeah.. that's what you get, L.A. County Fair (of Pomona) for not giving me free tickets as a means of promoting your shitty deep fried tourist trap!

Unfriend

Unfriend

Well, you better update your Office and internet spell checker to accept unfriend as a word again. It seems that this little piece of language garbage has made its way back into the world of the printed and vocal world. I blame the internet. Namely Facebook and Myspace. Since you have used it to define how you will remove a friend, the fine folks at the dictionary decided to just make Unfriend an official word

November 18, 2009 (CHICAGO) (WLS) -- Many years ago there was a very successful ad campaign for the "un-cola." It sold lots of pop. Now there is another "un" word in the news and it's raising lots of questions. The word is "unfriend."

"Unfriend" has nothing to do with traditional friendly relationships. It's all about "friends" on those social networks like Facebook, or test friends, or Twitter pals. And now unfriend has been named the word of the year by the New Oxford American Dictionary. It's a verb and it means to remove a friend on a social network.

Professor Craig Sirles of DePaul University studies languages and doesn't like the word but says it could be around for a long time, but he said beside that not to worry about it.

"I don't think this is a death knell at all for the English language," Sirles said. "I think what it does is it reflects a very, very popular cultural phenomenon that's going on among the 12 to 30 set."

And Sirles said that's O.K.

So there you have it. Way to ruin the English language folks. Isn't it bad enough that it already has such terrible rules. I before E.. except after C and blah blah blah. There's way too many rules to the English language that we buck on a daily basis, this one just sort of feels a little numb.



The dictionary is defining the verb as 'To remove someone as a "friend" on a social networking site such as Facebook. As in "I decided to unfriend my roommate after we had a fight." So we are letting society dictate our vocabulary. Oh what am I saying, that was always the case. I wonder if we're going to be living in the world full of poor grammar in a good 100 years.

But this does reflect the nature of social networking sites and how much of an impact they have on our every day life. Just recently this lady was fired because of her facebook photos.

ATLANTA (MyFOX ATLANTA) - A former Barrow County teacher said Tuesday that she was fired because of pictures and comments posted on her personal Facebook page. Ashley Payne said she is now suing to get her job back.

School teacher Ashley Payne posted pictures of her summer trip to Europe and detailed fun excursions with friends on her Facebook page, never imagining it would one day put her job in jeopardy.

"I wasn't doing anything illegal, I wasn't doing anything provocative," said Payne.

This has become such an issue that there's proposals to make facebook snooping illegal or not grounds for termination.

Bosses who check out their employees’ or job applicants’ Facebook or Twitter pages could get into trouble under a new federal law that protects workers’ genetic information and medical histories.

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, which went into effect Nov. 20, bars employers and health insurance providers from discriminating against individuals based on their genetic information and personal and family medical histories. The federal law is aimed at protecting an employee from getting fired or not hired because, for example, their boss finds out they have a genetic disposition toward a certain disease.

So I suppose the impact that these websites are making sure is pretty big. But maybe I have other issues with this being word of the year. I mean, it's the start of December and we're already getting to these silly end of the year list? How about we wait another month before we start declaring words of a full year. It's the only fair thing to do, I have to say.

And does this mean I can toss this into my next scrabble game? I mean, I guess it may get some sort of flak because it is one of those UN words, which the book says you can't use. But in this case, it's how the dictionary defines it as it's own word. Not one that you're simply putting UN in front of.



It makes me wonder how many times I've used it in a sentence. I mean, I've unfriended exgirlfriends before, but that was because their comments on my life and their need to but their heads into my business and act as if it was still close to a decade ago and that they still even have a remote chance of knowing the modern me seemed pretty much annoying. That and the constant "Remember when...." stuff that just screams that you're living in the past.

But then again, there's the idea that sometimes I unfriend people because it's a matter of not caring about every update you post and that you're posting a lot of them. Eventually if I don't care about what you're saying and I haven't talked to you in ages, then what's the point?

It's like those people who brag about having thousands of friends on their list of friends and who maybe only talked to... 1% of those people. It's just.. one of those things that those folks should really purge their friends list and start unfriending a lot of people. A lot of which they really aren't friends with.



Maybe the term is just wrong in itself. You never really were friends. You knew of each other. Maybe you've exchanged some verbal exchange in the middle some where. But you really can't say you were much of a friend. How about detagging someone you were in association with? That seems like it makes more sense.

Then again, it's just a silly application that will have the term ceasing to exist in a couple of years. According to Time magazine, here's the list of words taken out of the 2008 edition;

• Abstergent – Cleansing.
• Agrestic – Rural.
• Apodeictic – Unquestionably true by virtue of demonstration.
• Caducity – Perishableness.
• Caliginosity – Dimness.
• Compossible – Possible in coexistence with something else.
• Embrangle – To confuse.
• Exuviate – To shed.
• Fatidical – Prophetic.
• Fubsy – Squat.
• Griseous – Somewhat grey.
• Malison – A curse.
• Mansuetude – Gentleness.
• Muliebrity – The condition of being a woman.
• Niddering – Cowardly.
• Nitid – Bright.
• Olid – Foul-smelling.
• Oppugnant – Combative.
• Periapt – An amulet.
• Recrement – Refuse.
• Roborant – Tending to fortify.
• Skirr – A whirring sound, as of the wings of birds in flight.
• Vaticinate – Prophesy.
• Vilipend – To treat with contempt.

I would ask if we could still have a moment of silence for them.