Paul Has Been Dead All Along

Paul Has Been Dead All Along

Earlier this month The Beatles remastered disc were released. Oh yeah, and some Beatles rock band game people are playing was also released. I've had enough time to play around with them like a kid on Christmas.. as much as a kid can play with music on Christmas....

It's Sunday and well, I have to say that it really doesn't feel like a Sunday for me if I'm not listening to The Beatles sometime during the day. It's the way I grew up with Breakfast with the Beatles and going to the Pasadena flea market. Yeah, that's the ticket. Now that I've had almost a month to play around with the music, as much as one can play with music...


In any event, I have to say, I love the music. It's such a great thing to sit around and listen to the sounds of these remastered disc. As we're only four days away from Halloween, it's time to talk about spooky things.. Well, this isn't so spooky. It's just fact. Paul is dead. He died a long ass time ago. Yup, that was the urban legend long before snopes.com was ever around to confirm/deny it. The writing was on the wall and to be honest, I suppose I would have swallowed this pill if I was a youth at the time.

How could you not? Or, more to the point, what am I talking about, right? The legend goes that sprinkled in the Beatles music, by chance or deliberately placed, there is clues telling the listeners that in 1966, the original Paul McCartney, while working on Sgt. Pepper stormed out of a recording session after a fight and rode off in an Austin-Healey that he crashed into a lamp post and died. He was replaced with a Paul look/sound alike and the story carried on without anyone noticing.



You may have been curious as to why on the Let It Be album cover it features photos of all the Beatles taken from their rooftop performance except for Paul, who looks like he is in a studio with a red wall behind him. What's the deal there? Did they just not have a photo of his that worked there? It's cause Paul is dead, of course.

Take a look at the Abbey Road cover in detail from your remastered box and Paul really didn't do himself any favors to dispel the rumors of his death by walking out of step of the others and smoking a cigarette. Not to mention walking bare foot. Anyone of those things on their own and you can easily brush them off. But for those that actually bought into him being a doppelganger or replaced, man it must have broken their brains at the time. There isn't enough tin foil in the world to cover one mans head with all those clues stacked against them.



That stuff not enough to convince you? Take the lyrics of multiple Beatles songs. "He didn't notice that the lights had changed". At which point he crashes into a lamp post as you can hear car crash sounds in Revolution 9 and A Day In The Life. He was pronounced dead on a "Wednesday morning at 5 o'clock as they day begins"

A funeral procession was held days later, as was supposedly implied on the Abbey Road album cover by the Beatles' clothing. John dressed in white like a clergyman. Ringo wearing a black suit like an undertaker. Paul in a blue suit without shoes, as a corpse would and George dressed in blue jeans symbolizing a gravedigger.



More than anything, the walrus represents death in many cultures and Paul is the walrus after all. He's the only one on the Magical Mystery Tour cover that is in all black. Doesn't that ring some bells there?Yes. Let's forget the influence of Lewis Carroll's work on John Lennon here and just go along with the idea that Paul is dead.

Never mind "The Walrus and the Carpenter" where they lure youthful, unsuspecting oysters to follow them only so they could eat them. Much the same way Lennon felt about the Beatles' role in popular culture. Their young unsuspecting fans were looking tot he Beatles for answers but Lennon had none to give, so he came to see the Beatles as a con artist. The Walrus regrets playing such a trick on the oysters and he weeps for them. This can be seen as John sings "I'm crying," in I Am The Walrus.

Then again.. I think there's only one person who could solve this mystery of a dead Paul... BATMAN!

It's The Beatles!

It's The Beatles!

After every news outlet on Earth has been salivating over the impending release of the Beatles Rock Band, it's easy to overlook that there's an even bigger Beatles release on this 9-9-09 that shouldn't be overlooked because it's finally remastered perfectly. But first, a little back story.

The Beatles go back to my upbringing as when I was only a young lad my uncle would have a garage full of old records and I would hang out there learning about computers while he played record after record of Beatles albums. The influence was there from the get going and really, I haven't looked back since enjoying the sounds of the music in the original Mono as well as various Stereo quality releases, but it has never been this good before.



Back in April, on my birthday, the news was released that there was going to be a remastered edition of The Beatles catalogue.

We are delighted to announce the release of the original Beatles catalogue, which has been digitally re-mastered for the first time, for worldwide CD release on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 (09-09-09), the same date as the release of the widely anticipated "The Beatles: Rock Band" video game.

Each of the CDs is packaged with replicated original UK album art, including expanded booklets containing original and newly written liner notes and rare photos. For a limited period, each CD will also be embedded with a brief documentary film about the album. On the same date, two new Beatles boxed CD collections will also be released.

The albums have been re-mastered by a dedicated team of engineers at EMI's Abbey Road Studios in London over a four year period utilising state of the art recording technology alongside vintage studio equipment, carefully maintaining the authenticity and integrity of the original analogue recordings. The result of this painstaking process is the highest fidelity the catalogue has seen since its original release.

Can anyone believe that the Beatles CDs that you can buy in the stores now are the exact same ones that people were buying in 1987? Seriously, If anyone deserved the remastered treatment the most, it was the Beatles.

I think this is what everyone was waiting for after the release of "Love", high quality remasters without any of the song Mash Up stuff, that was involved in the Vegas show. I loved the LOVE album because it sounded so good for that very reason. Then you have the remastered mono versions... Wow, can you get me anymore excited?


Christ almighty, just how high were these guys? To answer that, they were so stoned they let Ringo sing!

The mono versions of the albums are the ones that the band was involved with the mixing of, and are quite different sounding than the stereo versions. I may sound like a snob here but if you listen to the mono version of Sgt. Pepper, it'll be so much better than the Stereo version.

Since we live in 2009, It's assumed that stereo is always the way to go. I mean, you have at least two car speakers while driving, right? But in this case you really should get over it and realize that "Drums in the left speaker" thing, is in fact, a separation that is very uncomfortable to listen to as well as ruins a lot of the mixing involved in the song resulting in a lot of lost sound.



This is going to sound like a nerd debate, but stay with me here. When talking about mono vs stereo, let's put it this way. When The Beatles recorded most of these, the popularity of stereo recordings was almost entirely a US phenomenon til about the late 60s. In most parts of the world, having big two-speaker stereo rigs was a rare indulgence, not a common sight. As a result, most non-US recordings tended to be mono first, stereo second, meaning that the bands and engineers would carefully mix a mono recording that they knew would be played on record players, radio stations, etc, to sound as good as possible. Then, as an afterthought, they made a nice, clean little stereo mix for audiophiles and record nerds.

In the US, the reverse was true by the early 60's a stereo mix was prepared that was then combined and remixed to work in mono. The only exceptions to this were pop singles, which had to stand out on tinny radio speakers to move product, and cheaper, fly-by-night teen sensation recordings meant to hit the market, make money, then get out (ie, Gary Lewis and the Playboys, the Surfaris, Bobby Vee, etc).



The biggest tale tell sign of this was shown in the mixing for Sgt. Pepper. The mixing for the mono session for the album ran over about three full days. The stereo mix was done in an afternoon. You can hear the difference. Plus, some of the effects Martin and the band were using didn't translate well to stereo - Lucy in the Sky suffers from this the most as it benefits in mono from thick psychedelic effects that are totally lost in the stereo version. You can also tell byt the fucked up stereo panning of "Eleanor Rigby," or the "Two guys n one speaker, the other two in the other" stuff that shows up in Rubber Soul. The stereo mixes were an afterthought right up until the White Album.

For a while I was enjoying the Mono and Stereo remastered editions from Bootlegger Dr.Ebbetts that were floating around. These were really amazing in the quality and from what I hear and to give you an idea on how great in quality these are, Dr Ebbetts has decided to hang up his needle and cease doing anymore work on The Beatles calaogue. He sent out an email saying he's heard the new masters and they're far superior to what he put out. That to me was the best thing to ever hear as his were damn great.



The best way to describe all this with regards to what works and what doesn't in stereo release is Balance. You don't have anything getting drowned out with the remasteres, and you start to hear things you didn't notice before. Some things jump out at you, others don't. I think the album that benefits the least from this remastering is The White Album. Then again, it sounded pretty good to begin with. Others that really pop to mind after listening to them are:

Please Please Me - is absolutely perfect in mono. You could barely even hear Paul in the old mixes or the stereo remaster but on the mono disc it's like you're standing directly between John and Paul competing for the lead.
Revolver in mono is delicious I want to eat it up for seconds and then have some more of it. If you're on the fence for the mono stuff, it's so worth it for the Revolver-era stuff. Sending the drums entirely to one channel was probably mind-blowing in its day, but it sure didn't stand the test of time, so I'm glad that they finally fixed that.



Though if you think they're done taking your money, just you wait. Apparently they're waiting until the 50th anniversary in 2012 to do the Deluxe Editions with the remixes, bonus tracks and high-def 5.1 stuff. Especially the tracks that were remixed for The Beatles Anthology and the 5.1 remixes of Help! and Yellow Submarine.

I'm still amazed by how well they could write and construct these great songs on such a consistent basis. Honestly, I can't wrap my head around it. Yesterday on a fucking napkin
and all in 7 years! Insane. Don't think it's because they weren't touring as often. Back then they would pack in more gigs and The Beatles were working seven nights a week in clubs doing twenty minute solos. So it's utterly amazing that nowadays two albums in a year is unheard of, let alone twelve in seven years.



Especially when you factor in that these guys were making films and TV appearances all the time. They were real busy and could still churn brilliant songs out so regularly. I gues Let It Be was when it all boiled over for them, although even that album has some pretty amazing songs on it. Then they cap off their career with Abbey Road. An album that I consider to be up there... then again, I consider all their albums to be pretty damn special.

The Beatles are awesome, stereo or mono, just go out and buy the god damn thing because it's utterly an amazing collection of work by four very talented men.