Showing posts with label crappy films. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crappy films. Show all posts

Friday, June 19, 2009

Star Wars: Episode 1 Ten Years Later

Star Wars: Episode 1 - Ten Years Later

It's May 19th, 2009, and as Star Wars Episode I was released on May 19th, 1999, that means that the Star Wars prequel trilogy had been part of our lives for a complete decade and is now officially retro. Just realize that ten years ago you were more than likely waiting in line for what will result to a shitty movie. Way to go. Oh wait, right now you were in the movie theater with your popcorn and your lightsaber on your belt clip (cause you know you ordered one of them son bitches) and the screen starts to flicker... A long time ago in a galaxy far far away....

Happy anniversary! Everyone celebrate by destroying millions of dreams!

Even by the standards of the old Star Wars movies - which weren't great shakes for dialogue or acting - it was a bad movie. The lead was played by a bad child actor saying and doing dumb things for long stretches of the film. Jar Jar is terrible, making Wicket the Ewok look like fucking Snake Plissken. Even the incidental aliens are terrible for the most part (e.g. Watto the Flying Space Jew, Nut Gunray of Fu Manchu).

None of this is news, but I don't think history will suddenly turn a 180 and declare the prequels joyous classics or something. 10 years later they just look dumber and the quality of the CGI doesn't have the shock value it did when they were new.



I feel like Qui-gon and Darth Maul were the only good things about that movie. They were both mysterious, badass characters and I would've rather seen both live and Darth Maul become Vader's nemesis or something. Then again, I really, really hate Darth Maul. ARRRG, I AM EVIL! JUST LOOK AT MY FACE!

The midichlorians destroyed a lot of the fantasy, but I think we can all I agree on that. Oh, the Force isn't all that special, and you have the same chance of being autistic as being force-sensitive. Okay, gee. Thanks a whole fuckin' lot there. Such a waste and killing my childhood dream of moving pencils with my mind.



I can't help but thing that the film could have been saved some by simply getting an older Anakin or even a different actor. The whole relationship between Padme and Anakin was creepy to say the least. The kid looked like he was playing with his crayons and Padme comes in robbingt he craddle. Then agian, let's just run through the list of the shit that this film piled on us.

-The character of Anakin Skywalker / Darth Vader couldn't possibly have been done more of a disservice by this movie and the prequel trilogy as a whole - in performance, in writing, in his arc to become Vader, and by his absurd backstory (virgin birth???).

-Midichlorians.

-An overreliance on bland special effects at the expense of storytelling. True, a lot of it was impressive at the time, but it has aged rapidly and a lot of it now looks like mediocre PS2 cutscenes - the robot/Gungan battle on the plain comes to mind, and the hilariously awful effect of Qui-gon grabbing Jar Jar and pulling him down near the beginning of the movie. Fellowship of the Ring is nearly as old and it still looks great. And let's not even discuss the flat-out insulting CGI stormtroopers in Episode II and III, as if George Lucas didn't have the fucking budget to get a few dozen stormtrooper outfits and extras to wear them.

-A cringe-inducing love story.

-Tedious action scenes like the pod race.

Of course, it is worth acknowledging that there were a few things that DID work:

-Qui-gon Jinn is maybe the only legitimately cool character introduced in the prequel trilogy. This is probably less because of George Lucas's script and direction and more because Liam Neeson, bless him, is actually trying to act through the blandness, but unlike the rest of the new Jedi he actually evokes the Jedi cool of Obi-wan in the original trilogy.



-I do really like the overall arc of Emperor Palpatine across the trilogy. Not every moment works, but his overall plot is genuinely well-told and interesting, and he is the only character whose appearance in the original trilogy is actually enriched and deepened the way the prequels should have done for all the characters. It gives dimension to what was in Return of the Jedi a menacing but extremely shallow cipher of evil.

-John Williams always delivers. Duel of the Fates was great. And on that note,

-Admit it, the Darth Maul lightsaber battle all blew our minds as kids. Even if Ray Park is paying his bills on the 20 buck convention photo and whatever silly movie will hire him for his stunt coordinating.



It's kind of a bittersweet time for the tenth anniversary, because not two weeks ago JJ Abrams showed us with Star Trek what nearly everyone agrees is the way a prequel to a beloved franchise should be done - with energy, excitement, genuine humor, and the proper balance of tributes to the classic series without it being nerd jerk-off fodder. As a lifelong Star Wars fan who had never seen anything Star Trek until last month, I never thought I'd be admitting that, but there it is.

What I hate most about the prequel trilogy is that, similarly to the Harry Potter films, it's so anxious to get the plot details across it forgets to make the characters likeable or even remotely interesting. How, for example, Lucas managed to get such a wooden, dull performance out of McGregor is baffling - it's almost an Olympian accomplishment. As a result the movies are the worst combination of goofy, childish action and dialogue and an excruciatingly dry stroy presentation, similar to a really horribly done political thriller.



They were all shit movies, I don't know which one was worse, 1 or 3. Ep. 1, with all of the stupid ass hijinks, or Ep. 3, which actually tried to be serious and failed so, so miserably. I thought Ep. 2 was the best, in that it was just a bunch of action scenes with mindless filler that I don't remember placed in between.

I still remember laughing in the theater (couldn't help myself) at the end of Revenge of the Sith, first when the robot doctor is like "she died of a broken heart" or some other drivel, and second the end with Vader, "nnnnnnNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooo!" Oh man that was precious. Looking back The Phantom Menace really was a huge waste of time because almost nothing from it is actually carried over into 2 and 3.

Fight Club is also going to turn ten years old this year, but I'll write a blog about that in October.

Thursday, May 7, 2009

S.Darko, Sometimes I Doubt Your Commitment To Sparkle Motion

S.Darko, Sometimes I Doubt Your Commitment To Sparkle Motion

I haven't even gone a few days since posting a blog about the piece of shit that is Wolvrine and here I am putting up with another shit film. Does it come to anyone's surprise that it's a Fox film as well?

Today we explore the world of S. Darko. Then unneeded sequel to Donnie Darko. I want to sit in on the conference that decided to cast this because nothing carries a movie better then the girl that voiced Lilo in the Disney movie Lilo and Stitch, and the main character of Step Up 2: The Streets.


Crap in High Quality

The story picks up seven years after the first film when little sister Samantha Darko and her best friend Corey are now 18 and on a road trip to Los Angeles when they are plagued by bizarre visions.

I had the unfortunate luck that I wanted to talk about something on this blog so I sat through it... It's basically a 14 year old girls fanfic about the donnie darko universe. Girls walk around in almost no clothes the whole movie long and meet guys, mention donnie a few times. cgi. Roberta Sparrows grandson hops along on the crazy wagon and they all go nowhere + more cgi. The End.



They rip off darko left and right but somehow nothing makes sense, characters come from nowhere and stuff happens for no reason. The only thing that this movie has going for it is that it's decently filmed and the cgi is ok. That's it.

And can we talk about the name? It sounds like Starko. When asking your friends if they want to come over and watch Starko, they may think you're talking about Tony Stark and Iron Man. According to IMDB, its full title is S.Darko: A Donnie Darko Tale. Way to cash in on the craze of yester years.


(Insert yet another Sparkle Motion joke here)

The writing isn't any better in the script than it is on that title page.

"When I was your age I experienced things that made me feel like God didn't exist"

What an incredible writer, whoever penned this thing. I think this movie is just not meant to be understood on any level. I don't know why I didn't turn it off after the first five minutes. Maybe I just like pain. I guess I was trying to give it a chance to become something comprehensible, but that never happened. Though I made more sense than than Fire Walk With Me.


Daria Darko. It'll make a much better sequel.

Southland Tales made a fuckton more sense than this. That's saying something considering how many other books you had to read/find to have that make any sense. It could at least have an awesome website like the original Donnie Darko. I cracked it at 2am and freaked the fuck out when it started talking to me.

I was tempted to turn this off when I saw a goddamn motherfucking unicorn running in the clouds, but I didn't. I was again tempted to turn it off when the suave James Dean jackass in the red sports car and wayfarers made his first appearance, despite the fact that's he from a Bumfuck, Nowhere town. I still didn't. But when Samantha started doing the whole ghostly/Frank thing and talking in a deep voice, I just couldn't handle the bullshit anymore. I wanted a plane engine to litertally drop ontop of me.



It's as if the director never got what Donnie Darko was about and just went for the movie's style, not really grasping that either. I'm sure I already said it before, but perhaps my investment in this comes from the fact that I kept getting told that I look like Jake Gyllenhaal, Donnie Darko himself. So yeah, let's not taint that anymore than Brokeback Mountain already did. Geez, the amount of gay cowboy comments after that film went up by, at least 90%.

So what's the final verdict? It's an incoherent mess. I'll wait for the wacky porno parody - Sparkle Lotion: Samantha Darko's 18th Birthday

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Shitty Movies

Shitty Movies

Following a weekend that saw Tylor Perry's Madea Goes To Prison top the box-office on the last weekend of Coraline in 3D, I'm left just shaking my head. But then again, I'm looking at this with tainted glasses. Madea isn't for me to begin with.

Tyler Perry's intended audience is the black version of The Blue Collar Comedy Tour's intended audience - lower-middle class, non-denominational Christian, socially conservative, and very committed to traditional gender and family roles. Also a lot of his humor comes from Southern culture, which doesn't appear to have a real analogue in any other country.



That specific demographic is obviously not what most movie makers want to appeal to. In appealing to it, he basically ensures himself a lot of dough irregardless because people in that demographic just typically feel disenfranchised by every other movie/filmmaker out there who doesn't put forth a "wholesome" message in all their movies.

The fact that his audience is the largest movie going audience in the country kind of guarantees profits for all his productions. He just built his own $100 million studio in Atlanta. 5 sound stages and a NYC back lot. He knows the audience he's catering to and they eat it up in the southeast for sure.



But I have to say, Men in drag hasn't been funny since Monty Python.

Then we go to beating a dead horse. Which I'm sort of surprised they could even reach given that it should be under a commercial jet engine. They actually made a sequel to Donnie Darko.

S.Darko, the sequel to Donnie Darko

Yes. That's correct. There's now a sequel to Donnie Darko that has nothing to do with Richard Kelly. It's coming straight to DVD/BD and that seems about a right place for it as ever. It's a film that's not needed.

None of what I just watched made any sense. Then again, I think I heard that after watching the first one. I'm not sure time travel is something a lot of people get any grasp on. I dunno, maybe my years as a comic reader and the wacky use of time travel just made it more acceptable but I get how time travel works. I understand string theory and hypertime isn't that far fetched. So hey, your nerd miles may vary?



Despite all the nerd backlash, I still really like the first Donnie Darko (not the director's cut, which ruined it) but this looks absolutely terrible. I'll probably watch it even though it's basically the cinematic equivalent of a fanfic. At least they got the original actress, but holy shit, Daveigh Chase is 18 now? I'm old.

If the original was basically a surreal version of how it sucked growing up in the 80s, this one is going to be all 90s references? It looks like they took the original film and tried to turn it into your run-of-the-mill Hollywood horror flick. Say what you want about Richard Kelly, but he doesn't deserve this. Did the new director actually watch the first movie, or just see a trailer and read a plot synopsis.



Maybe I'm just a little defensive about all this because I constantly got told that I had this sort of Jake Gyllenhaal look. I'm not sure if that was a good or bad thing considering Brokeback Mountain and all, but hey, at least I'm linked up with a dead Oscar winner, right? I dunno. I guess I can sometimes see it in older pictures. So having folks tell me "Yo Donnie!" was alright, but now with a shitty made for DVD film... I dunno, I may have to severe that connection by breaking my nose or getting reconstructive surgery. Nah, then I'll be like Mickey Rourke.

And finally in the world of shitty movies, a day before the Oscars, in an attempt to steal some thunder, the Razzies were announced.

WORST PICTURE
Disaster Movie AND Meet the Spartans ("Two Movies- One Berry Badly Beaten Dead Horse of a Concept!")
The Happening
The Hottie and the Nottie
In the Name of the King
The Love Guru

WORST ACTOR
Larry the Cable Guy- Witless Protection
Eddie Murphy- Meet Dave
Mike Myers- The Love Guru
Al Pacino- 88 Minutes and Righteous Kill
Mark Wahlberg- The Happening and Max Payne

WORST ACTRESS
Jessica Alba- The Eye and The Love Guru
Annette Bening, Eva Mendes, Debra Messing, Jada Pinkett-Smith and Meg Ryan- The Women
Cameron Diaz- What Happens in Vegas
Paris Hilton- The Hottie and the Nottie
Kate Hudson- Fool's Gold and My Best Friends Girl

WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Uwe Boll (as Uwe Boll)- Postal
Pierce Brosnan- Mamma Mia!
Ben Kingsley- The Love Guru and War, Inc. and The Wackness
Burt Reynolds- Deal and In the Name of the King
Verne Troyer- The Love Guru and Postal

WORST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Carmen Electra- Disaster Movie and Meet the Spartans
Paris Hilton- Repo: The Genetic Opera
Kim Kardashian- Disaster Movie
Jenny McCarthy- Witless Protection
Leelee Sobieski- 88 Minutes and In the Name of the King

WORST SCREEN COUPLE
Uwe Boll & Any Actor, Camera, or Screenplay
Cameron Diaz and Ashton Kutcher- What Happens in Vegas
Paris Hilton and either Christine Lakin or Joel David Moore- The Hottie and the Nottie
Larry the Cable Guy and Jenny McCarthy- Witless Protection
Eddie Murphy IN Eddie Murphy- Meet Dave

WORSE PREQUEL, REMAKE, RIP-OFF, OR SEQUEL
The Day the Earth Stood Still (referred to by the Razzies as "The Day the Earth Blowed Up Real Good")
Disaster Movie AND Meet the Spartans
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Speed Racer
Star Wars: The Clone Wars

WORST DIRECTOR
Uwe Boll- 1968: Tunnel Rats and In the Name of the King and Postal
Jason Freidberg and Aaron Seltzer- Disaster Movie and Meet the Spartans
Tom Putnam- The Hottie and the Nottie
Marco Schabnel- The Love Guru
M. Night Shyamalan- The Happening


Want my picks for those? Fuck it, ALL OF THEM ARE AWFUL! I don't want to even remember any of those films. Thank you kindly.

Enough Shit, where's the quality material?