Facial Treatment

Facial Treatment

I'm not even going to bother with tossing this topic out using "A FRIEND" or the thought that some reader sent me an e-mail about this. Because let's face it.. I have none. Not to mention if I did have any readers, they wouldn't bother sending me hate mail, let alone relationship/sex questions.

If you're anyone who has seen any porn in your life you're probably aware of the concept of a Facial. In case your virgin eyes haven't ever seen a porn or you've been home schooled, here's Wikipedia to give you a good description of the act.

A facial (also facial cumshot or cum facial) is a term for the sexual activity in which a man ejaculates semen onto the face of one or more sexual partners.

A facial is a form of non-penetrative sex, though it is generally performed after some other means of sexual stimulation, such as anal sex, intercourse, masturbation, or oral sex. Facial cumshots are regularly depicted in Western and Japanese pornographic media, often as a way to close a scene.

My thought on this issue is this.. I don't get it. If your partner is down with it, what's my moral standings to say it's not Okay. Besides, this isn't just a feminist concern. Maybe gay men enjoy facials too? I don't know! But do men like it because it is a way of dominating their partner? Would men do it if they didn't have porn to learn it from?

I get it - what goes on between two consenting adults is nobodies business but theirs and trying to stop facials because they are demeaning is like trying to stop gay sex because it makes god mad. It really is just some perspective on the matter.

Besides, if you tell a young woman that her behavior has to conform to feminist principles or else she is a gender traitor you are just seeking to replace patriarchal control over her with feminist control. You are essentially saying 'we don't trust you to make your own decisions'. The whole thing just turns into a giant stamp of approval like a rabbi waving his hands at a warehouse to make diet coke kosher.

Woah, didn't think I could some how link diet coke to cum, now did you? I suppose if a girl wants to take a few thick ropes on the chin, she can take a shower and still go out of the house that day carrying a torch for Women's rights. I won't judge her.. but I will wonder why?

The only reason why it's even considered acceptable now is because our generation grew up with hardcore porn where it's the norm considering porn almost always includes degradation and humiliation of the female.. cause that's what sells. If you considered that then you probably wouldn't want to do it to someone you actually cared about.

Why oh why would you want to emulate something you've seen in a porno in real life? Why no, there's certainly not anything wrong with that right there.. Not anything at all.. I mean, it's all subjective, right. In the bible there's wives who wouldn't let them spill their seed upon open ground or he'd be killed on the spot. Sex is for procreation - not for facial miniaturization.

Then again, ejaculating INSIDE a female partner seems to be more of a patriarchal/egotistical action. You're basically attempting to create more of yourself for the purpose of carrying out your goals in the world.

Just belly bust it on your lady, man. Then go and get the tissues. And that's if you're not using condoms.. which you should be if you're just randomly hooking up and not in a serious relationship now.

The act of ejaculating on the female face is the assertion of a sexual dominion, or geospacial hegemony over the women (or “receptacle”). By isolating the semiotics of the face from the bodily integrity and multiplicity of the subject, it denies the female recipient the context of the biological functions of the reproductive system, emphasizing the unnaturality as perversity of the act. The racial-colonial element of this hegemony is characterized by the creamy white colour of the semen, landing at various territories of the face and spreading slowly along the path of least resistance with the implicit purpose of reproducing the colonial model of the yeoman-settler(1)

1) Noam Chomsky: Hegemony or Survival

I mean, you're hiding a females face under a layer of pure masculinity - Truly the most feminist thing one can ever do... Just think about it. Your girlfriend/boyfriend is okay with it, or willing to deal with it because their thinking is based on an idea of "pleasing your man" that has been warped due to an aggressively misogynistic culture.

As always, feedback is always welcome. That one dude who spams my comments with Japanese porn links gets awfully lonely. Just go ahead and spray the conversation everywhere and see where it lands. Maybe one topic will stick and I'll write more on it.

Too Hot For Showtime: Dexxxxxxxxxter

Too Hot For Showtime: Dexxxxxxxxxter

It's pretty simple. Dexter is a show about a serial killer. He's played by Michael C. Hall and I suppose this is a stretch for him to deal with dead people. I mean, talk about acting stretches. It's been going on for a couple of seasons now. Season 2 and 3 weren't as great as season 1. That much is a fact. This last season has really been great.

John Lithgow has come in as the Trinity Killer, someone who shows Dexter that they are a bit similar and that he could learn a lot about daily life through their unknown serial killer similarities. It has reached some intense points but it seems that tonight's episode will continue that and may give us some resolution... maybe.

I know one thing for sure though, there's one thing that wont give you blue balls.. Porn! Wait, no. You're not actually having sex, so porn actually gives you nothing but blue balls. Apparently there's a Dexter porn parody titled "Dexxxter" (Yeah, you may not want to open that link at work)

And a little blurb about it;

Join sex crime investigator, Dexxxter Whoregan (Nikki Rhodes) as she investigates some of Miami’s sexiest and raunchiest cases. Adult stars Lexi Belle, McKenzie Sweets, Kya Tropic, Lynx and more perform in some steamy scenes in this parody on the Showtime hit, Dexter. Fans of the original show will appreciate the attention to detail, and hardcore porn lovers will surely get off on this hot feature!

Along with "Dexxxter Whoregan" there is also a "Sergeant Strokes". I've seen just the intro, and they recreate the Dexter intro pretty well. But then again, I'm not sure that qualifies it for a good porn award. Besides, I heard it's a real let down. Isn't that a shame. All that pumping up and no push behind it.



Here's the prologue;

"Hi, my name is Dexxxter. Dexxxter Whoregan. The extra X's are for sex. I don't know what made me what I am, but whatever it was, it left a very horny place inside me."

But this isn't a new thing. Porn parodies have been around since the dawn of.. porn. It's a way to get you in the door. But then again, Nikki Rhodes should be enough for that, am I right, boys? Does anyone know if there is one for Battlestar Galactica?

I guess this one has one advantage over the show - It doesn't feature John Lithgow's naked ass. Which was terrifying the couple of times it was on Showtime. Thanks again, Showtime.. ugh.

Super Blow XLIII

Super Blow XLIII

Remember a couple years back when Janet Jackson's tit was displayed for the world to see on the 50 yard line? Well, this one takes it and scores the touchdown in terms of broadcasting bloopers.

Super Bowl porn hits US viewers

US sports fans in Arizona got a surprise when their TV coverage of American football's Super Bowl was interrupted by a pornographic film.

Tucson-based KVOA-TV said it was "dismayed and disappointed" after some cable viewers had their match coverage disrupted towards the end of the game. The company said the material was only seen by viewers of one cable network. "KVOA will investigate what happened and make sure our viewers get answers," company president Gary Nielsen said.

"When the NBC feed of the Super Bowl was transmitted from KVOA to local cable providers and through over-the-air antennas, there was no pornographic material," he added. Comcast, the cable company whose viewers saw the material, said it was investigating. Local media outlets reported that they received calls from furious viewers.

The clip showed a woman unzipping a man's trousers, followed by a graphic act between the two.I just figured it was another commercial until I looked up," viewer Cora King told the Arizona Daily Star."Then he did his little dance with everything hanging out."

The interruption happened just after the last touchdown by the Arizona Cardinals, who lost the match to the Pittsburgh Steelers.

I like to believe that this was a bit of a premature dick slap in the face to the Steelers by an overzealous Cardinals fan. It's these kinds of thing that makes these events worth watching. Too bad it wasn't nationwide.



I dunno, guys. I'm gonna write it off as a wardrobe malfunction. No one could hijack a broadcast signal these days, the last time was during the Max Headroom days. Now that was a signal broadcast to remember! I can hear it now on news reports "Tyler Durden was not available for comment."

So what's all the talk about? See for yourself if you feel inclined to see a big dong on your computer screen. This is what comcast viewers saw.

I do not see the "graphic act" referred to in article. Unless shaking your dick back an forth is somehow an intimate two person game that I've just never been exposed to.

I know what you're thinking. Showing a dude's penis on-air during the Super Bowl is wrong. Their could be children watching. But it's kind of funny considering that a few years ago Fox was showing ads for not one, but TWO erectile dysfunction pills. This clip just showed that those pills worked!


They're happy they won.. but sad they missed it.

If Comcast gets fined, then they'd actually have a reason for jacking up prices for a change. Fortunately there is no one with the authority to fine Comcast for showing obscenity. Criminal obscenity charges could be leveled against them, but that seems pretty unlikely since they were presumably not actually the ones who intentionally chose to show the material.

I could imagine the reaction by those with Cox cable who didn't see this; "Nuts, I was recording it, but alas, I have Cox!" It should have been Cox cable that made this mistake. It would have been more satisfying to have someone tell me they saw a cock while watching Cox cable. Forget getting rickroll'ed, this seems like the latest internet craze, DickRoll.

I think the question we are all thinking here is what was that clip from and where can I get the rest of the video? Well, as your answer man I can deliver on that. It is from Club Jenna's "18 'n' Up Wet Poons."


Oh the good ol' days of superbowl bloopers

Really though, I guess the Super Bowl can't get around nudity during it's broadcast whether it happens on stage during the halftime show or not. I guess in a couple of years we're due for full on penetration during the game.

This probably caused quite a stir in the 14-60 year old male crowd watching with their wives/girlfriends/parents/grandchildren who panicked in the notion that their computer porn somehow made its way on to their television. That must have been the most terrifying half minute ever.

What's hilarious is that there are at least ten seconds before we actually see his junk where it's obvious what's going on and any responsible parent would have turned off the damn TV. The wife and kids must have thought it was another racy Superbowl commercial coming up.

Either way I still appreciate the humor in this. Some dude will undoubtedly be fired